Last week, Nick spotted . $710 is much cheaper than we've seen such a display before. But it's still an awful lot of cash. So, how about the same size, resolution and refresh rate for well under half the price? Give it up for the .
The difference, of course, is that the Gigabyte OLED will also hit 1,000 nits peak for HDR highlights. And it has perfect per-pixel lighting and black levels. And 0.03 ms response. And...hang on, why am I talking about that OLED?
, which is the main worry. VA panels aren't the [[link]] quickest and even then plenty are rated at 1 ms. Put it this way, if the last word in pixel response is your priority, this isn't the monitor to go for.
On the other hand, if you're looking for a larger panel format with plenty of pixels, this is an awful lot of screen for the money. While the VA panel tech isn't the best for pixel speed, it does offer much better contrast and black levels than any IPS monitor.
It also has HDR10 support, so you can at least watch HDR content or play HDR games with correct color rendering, even if the 300-nit rating and lack of local dimming mean you won't actually be getting an HDR experience.
As for connectivity, there's both HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4. That means you can get the full high-refresh experience of this 165 Hz monitor over both interfaces. Actually, it would make quite a good monitor to share across a PC and console.
The 4K [[link]] resolution will be fab for things like strategy games and the latest AAA graphics fests. will probably look epic on this panel.
Of course, that 4K pixel grid puts quite the load on any GPU, which doesn't necessarily sit well with the budget pricing. You're probably going to want a $600-plus GPU at minimum to make the most of this $300 monitor.
Still, upscaling techs like Nvidia's DLSS make higher resolutions including 4K more doable than before on mid-range GPUs. And the 32-inch form factor and elevated pixel density make this a great all-around for daily computing duties when you aren't gaming.
Ultimately, at this kind of price point, compromises always have to be made. $300 isn't going to buy you the latest OLED tech. But if you can live with the shortcomings entailed here, namely less-than-stellar pixel response and merely adequate brightness, then you'll get a very high-end experience in several other regards for a remarkably reasonable price.